Numbers, with their method attached.
Reproducible performance measurements across platforms, AI models and multi-stream workloads.
Four chapters, each starting with the answer and the key numbers. Full reports have the scripts and configuration.
What would you like to see?
Pick a question and we'll take you straight to the answer.
{{ platTitle }}
{{ platDesc }}
Across six perception models, Q911 is {{ percRange }} faster.
Average FPS on INT8 models: TFLite (QNN HTP) on EXMP-Q911 vs TensorRT on Jetson AGX Orin, 30 W on both. Each row has its own scale.
One EXEC-Q911 sustains 16 channels at 720p, and 4 at 4K.
Beyond these counts the CPU saturates and per-channel FPS drops. NPU use stayed below about 50%, so the CPU is the bottleneck, not the NPU.
INT8 makes the model about 3.5× smaller and 30–42% faster, for an 8–11% mAP drop.
iQ-Foundry conversions on EXMP-Q911, LiteRT runtime. The report also covers ONNX Runtime and W8A16.
Results depend on the model, runtime versions, power mode, and test method, so compare numbers only under the same conditions. To reproduce one, start from Get Started.